In recent years the economic experts have evaluated the formidable China in encroaching on the industry, the overall strategy is "mimic how the effectiveness of the opponent, but with abundant capital inflows than". And in fact that's the way a lot of big football clubs in European history to maintain their dominance.
A team invested a lot of money but United always achievement fluctuation in years
A typical example is the Bayern Munich first decade of 2010. Witness Dortmund coach Jürgen Klopp won two consecutive Bundesliga title, Bayern aggressive investors and even "blood" of the Dortmund (Gotze, Lewandowski, Hummels ), plus a copy of the essence of gameplay Gegenpressing that Klopp apply to win a treble.
Step into the new decade also had a notable developments occurred equally with English football. Man City invested heavily to have a strong squad as well as invited Pep Guardiola, while Liverpool set up a system of data analysis to help recruit players and technical training, tactical. In turn, City 4 times UK champion and now has a beautiful style of play, while Liverpool National Championships & European lineup combines star bargain purchase and "blockbuster" expensive.
Premier League big competitive than the Bundesliga by dividing the amount of revenue, but Manchester United remain the team has the biggest fan base and revenue of the number 1. Day they split Sir Alex Ferguson, Manchester United must have leaders recognize the threat that Manchester City brings the power and fade is not Chelsea, Manchester United have done so?
Sadio Mané, a typical triumph of military strategy in buying Liverpool
They appoint David Moyes remained backward in thinking and choosing a trainer Ed Woodward experience not to charge transfer. Moyes took the then Manchester United has welcomed Louis Van Gaal and Mourinho celebrated with its own philosophy, but after 1-2 season better off as a result the flat bowl and they go, while Woodward was still there.
If MU is an aggressive team, they now must have dismissed Woodward to find a real sporting director. See where they must correct wrong there, but only MU leadership of the coaches saw something wrong while in office to Woodward. And the result is a shopping season that gave the country a new jump, catch the majority of recruits in the final days of the transfer window, while the big goals are not coming.
Do football superficial
Recently sporting director Monchi's director Sevilla have expressed surprise in an interview for the Telegraph, that until now has not appointed MU someone in his position like that just to Woodward responsibility. "My team is an expert in investing less but successful and I noticed in England, Leeds or Liverpool and Manchester City also have their counterparts like me. So the structure at MU confuses me "Monchi said.
Does any "blockbuster deficit" in MU are just a PR role appease public opinion of Ed Woodward?
Those familiar with the history of the club 15 years ago knew Ed Woodward still in office because the benefactor of the Glazers. Family tycoon United States did not put serious about winning the MU upon a money machine giant hand, whenever the fan discontent, they threw money to the few "blockbuster", while Woodward Exam Some rumors coming appointed sports director on the newspaper to appease public opinion.
Buy stars with MU is easy but they have gone through thorough research process both video and data as Liverpool? Among the players are buying period 2015-2017 to 11 people (Firmino, Grujic, Matip, Gomez, Milner, Mane, Wijnaldum, Van Dijk, Salah, Oxlade-Chamberlain, Robertson) is still in Liverpool while Manchester United just 6 (Martial, Romero, Pogba, Bailly, Matic, Lindelof). Even if you just take the 2015 & 2016, the Liverpool still have 7 players still remained.
Vital signs of a mighty force can survive long as the readiness of forces in learning from competitors and make yourself stronger. And in that respect, perhaps MU is a man sleeping on former glory, if they really desire to compete, then learned Liverpool & Man City a long time ago.